related link

[John Nilsson]

It seems to me that project lambda fits better with, well, lambdas.

The other goals would probably be better addressed with some static
construct, like macros.

BR,
John

On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Neal Gafter <neal at gafter.com> wrote:

> Jesse-
>
> That article provides a good understanding of the goals of BGGA and CfJ
> 0.6a/b (and the openjdk closures project), as contrasted with the goals of
> the current effort (openjdk project lambda).
>
> Cheers,
> Neal
>
> On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Jesse Kuhnert <jkuhnert at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > With no intention of implying that either language is close enough to
> > be compared directly,  just that it's a lengthy analysis of the
> > subject matter here which might provide more mental fuel.
> >
> > http://yehudakatz.com/2010/02/07/the-building-blocks-of-ruby/
> >
> >
>
>