Function types versus arrays

[Neal Gafter]

On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Reinier Zwitserloot
<reinier at zwitserloot.com> wrote:
> Er, okay, same question, but with "Object" as type for both second
> parameters. In editing it to look a bit more like a real situation I added a
> distinct post-erasure type by accident. As if you didn't know what I was
> asking.

As you've seen, these issues don't arise often in practice, and can
easily be fixed by renaming one of the methods.