Function types versus arrays

[Howard Lovatt]

Neal,

Good point, something I had missed. I will think on it.

Thanks for finding a bug,

   -- Howard

On 19/02/2010, at 2:36 AM, Neal Gafter <neal at gafter.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Howard Lovatt  
> <howard.lovatt at iee.org> wrote:
>> Hi Neal,
>>
>> On 17 February 2010 16:26, Neal Gafter <neal at gafter.com> wrote:
>>> Howard-
>>>
>>> Can you please show the implementation of
>>> _Array_From_void_throws_ChangedCharSetException_SAXParseException_UnkownHostException__To_void_throws_AWTException_IOException_SAXException.instance?
>>
>> Sure:
>
> This implementation is incorrect, because the two arrays must act as
> one.  This method is supposed to implement the subtype relationship
> between two array types.  Assigning to an element of one array value
> must modify the corresponding element of the array value which is its
> subtype.  But with your implementation, the two arrays are
> disconnected.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________