Effectively final effective?

[Jesse Kuhnert]

That does make some sense. They could also be improved with the
closure change but then that's a fundamental change.

No experience watching language change features discussed before but I
find it hard to think of as being the same as "API" changes wrt
backwards compatibility.. Compromising the "best possible" for that
doesn't completely sound assuring. Mire like java 2.0 if you were
numbering it realistically instead of marketing or
that-sounds-too-nerdy speak.

On Thursday, February 25, 2010, Paulo Levi <i30817 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Jesse Kuhnert <jkuhnert at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> If anonymous inner classes are something everyone thinks shouldn't be
> there anyway then they shouldn't be considered too strictly. Shouldn't
> they become obsolete with this project anyways?
>
> Not for multiple methods templates (like mouselistener).
> I use inner classes then, but many do not.
>
>
>
>