return-from-lambda viewed as dangerous, good alternatives

[Joshua Bloch]

Neal,


On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Neal Gafter <neal at gafter.com> wrote:

>
> It would be a shame to need a third, fourth, or fifth closure-like
> construct.  (Ruby has about seven)
>
>
There is a big difference between "not prevent[ing]" something (Stefan's
words) and "need[ing]" it (yours).

           Josh