Function types syntax

[Ian Clough]

Please forgive me if this is a stupid question but doesn't operator 
precedence determine what the expression actually means?

On 27/01/2010 20:15, John Rose wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2010, at 5:44 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
>
>    
>> Postfix notation (arrow) have also a problem with array brackets,
>> int ->  int[] can be a function type that return int[] or an array of
>> function type that returns int.
>>      
> Good point.  That is a corner case which would require something like declarator parentheses:  int ->  int[] vs. (int ->  int)[].
>
> Even apart from the effects on higher order function type syntax, that still looks better (to me) than the strawman: #int[](int) vs. #int(int)[].
>
> -- John
>
>