Preparing for the 0.2 draft

[Paul Benedict]

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Rémi Forax <forax at univ-mlv.fr> wrote:
> Le 29/01/2010 21:05, Joshua Bloch a écrit :
>> Alex,
>>
>> Thanks for your continued work on this, and for soliciting our input at this
>> phase.  I'm heading off for a weekend vacation, and will get back to you on
>> Monday. I think it would be useful to solicit input from other interested
>> parties as well, given the self-selected nature of this group.  Very
>> briefly:
>>
>>   The "foo.()" invocation syntax looks like a winner,
>>
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>>
>
> Don't agree.
> Anyway, what is the proposed way to do reflection on a
> lambda invocation method ?
>

Ick. foo.() looks like a syntax error. Why does it have to be
esoteric? Wasn't the alternative foo.invoke()?

Paul