Transparancy

[Brian Goetz]

> I think it is a bit backwards to introduce something new for a current thing to keep an option to have something current mean something new in the future.

Seriously?  It would be outright incompetence for a language steward to *not* 
consider what might happen in the future.

But your point is taken.  In future, perhaps I should not be sharing my 
thoughts on the future direction of the language with the public, because its 
obviously too confusing.