Removal of function types

[Doug Lea]

On 07/07/10 13:18, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> I suggest using this thread to comment on the removal of function types :-)
>

As one of the instigators-by-counter-example of function types,
I do wonder what the plan is for providing dozens if not
hundreds of SAM types for (parallel) aggregate operations.
As in my infamous workarounds at:
http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/jsr166/dist/extra166ydocs/extra166y/Ops.html

-Doug