Too terse and too alien?
Florian Weimer
fweimer at bfk.de
Wed Jun 2 01:26:43 PDT 2010
* Mikael Grev:
> As I think Oracle already know, things like
>
> myClosure.(1, 5)
>
> won't fly very well with the general developer. The reasoning behind
> the dot, that the name otherwise lives in the same name space as
> methods, is not understandable by most. And even for me it looks
> like a compiler purists way of reasoning. myClosure(1, 5) is the
> only way. It looks Java (my interpretation if it) and my IDE will
> color/font code it for me to distinguish it from a method call,
> which it isn't completely unrelated to anyway.
Isn't there an ambiguity when the dot is omitted and there's some
syntax for method handles in the language?
--
Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
More information about the lambda-dev
mailing list