Exception transparency - lone throws (no checked exceptions)
Florian Weimer
fweimer at bfk.de
Thu Jun 10 10:03:02 PDT 2010
* Alex Blewitt:
> How could this work in the face of subclasing?
I guess the goal is to put
void close() throws;
into java.io.Closeable, and still retain source-level compatibility.
> What if I invoke that abstract method - what types am I expecting to
> catch?
When a block calls a throws method, checks for checked exceptions are
disabled for this block. This is required because otherwise, existing
client code would not compile anymore.
A block which does not call such a method needs to use a catch-throws
clause. Previously, it could not catch those exceptions, so there
isn't a compatibility issue.
--
Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
More information about the lambda-dev
mailing list