Exception transparency III - The Advent of the No-Throw Area

[Gernot Neppert]

Right, you've already suggested the "no throws" idea. I somehow missed
it. Sorry!


2010/6/15 Howard Lovatt <howard.lovatt at gmail.com>:
> Alessio Stalla alessiostalla at gmail.com Tue Jun 15 02:38:43 PDT 2010 wrote:
>> Really, what Oracle wants - from my understanding of the discussion so far
>> - is to embed thrown
>> exception information in closure types and abstract over it. Any other
>> option is not being considered.
> I also suspect the aim is exception transparency rather than something else
> in the same space.
>
>  -- Howard.
>
> PS I have also suggested the no checked exception option, except for SAM
> types: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-dev/2010-June/001583.html