Defender methods and compatibility

[Neal Gafter]

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Alex Buckley <alex.buckley at oracle.com>wrote:

> Now C would not compile. We all agree C must be changed so it declares m
> and (probably) delegates to I.m or J.m. But the add-extn to J remains a
> source-incompatible change.
>

Right.  We agree that add-extn is a source-incompatible change.  My point
was that mod-extn should be a source-compatible change, but you've specified
it to be a source-incompatible change.

Cheers,
Neal