Defender methods and compatibility

[Rémi Forax]

  Le 29/11/2010 01:35, Brian Goetz a écrit :

[...]

>> I propose to use the declaring type instead of the default method
>> to disambiguate.
> Your rules below all produce the same results as the currently described rules.  Can you offer an example where your rules produce a different result?

No I can't. In fact, I hope that the semantics are equivalent.
The current spec mandates that first type of the default method is
the declaring type of the interface, so considering that type or
the default method is equivalent.

Rémi