Defender methods and compatibility

[Mark Thornton]

On 30/11/2010 08:18, Peter Levart wrote:
> So the preferred way of defining a common extension method which could 
> be re-used by other vendors is to define a common super-interface with 
> a single extension method which all concerned interfaces would extend. 
> No SC breakage would result if this "single" definition is ever 
> changed (being inline or not).
That common super interface needs to include all the methods relevant to 
the extension method.

Mark