Varargs, method reference and SAM conversion
Rémi Forax
forax at univ-mlv.fr
Tue Jan 11 07:28:35 PST 2011
Le 11/01/2011 14:01, Collin Fagan a écrit :
> Hi Remi,
>
> Just to clarify, you would like varargs paramaters to be .. um,
> "flattened" (unwound? de-vared?) when checking for compatible method
> signatures during method reference assignment?
yes.
>
> That sounds cool, would you think a method that has a vararg should
> also compatible with methods that take none of the vararg type?
>
> interface PrintOneString {
> void printOneString(String value);
> }
> PrintTwoStrings pts = System.out#printf;
> pts.printOneString("value");
Yes, I don't think there is a problem here.
>
> Collin
Rémi
More information about the lambda-dev
mailing list