Expected distribution of lambda sizes (Re: Syntax poll, take 2)

Jack Moxley jack at moxley.co.uk
Thu Jun 16 01:07:33 PDT 2011


That is the most faulty piece of transposed logic I have ever witnessed. I believe Reinier was refering to style of development.
      _____  

  From: Alex Blewitt [mailto:alex.blewitt at gmail.com]
To: Reinier Zwitserloot [mailto:reinier at zwitserloot.com]
Cc: lambda-dev [mailto:lambda-dev at openjdk.java.net]
Sent: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:36:48 +0100
Subject: Re: Expected distribution of lambda sizes (Re: Syntax poll, take 2)

On 16 Jun 2011, at 08:03, Reinier Zwitserloot <reinier at zwitserloot.com> wrote:

> Using the apparent aggregate preferences of the greater java community, as
> gleaned by looking at a lot of open source code, I conclude that the greater
> java community will likely end up putting a lot more linebreaks in closure
> bodies than we are doing with these examples.

Using this logic, we can conclude that no-one in the greater Java community will be interested in lambdas, since looking at open source code shows no sign of lambda use at the moment. 

Alex

      
   
 


More information about the lambda-dev mailing list