The prefix symbol
Colin Decker
cgdecker at gmail.com
Tue Jun 21 14:56:30 PDT 2011
How does it actually *help* anything to use some annoying to type symbol for
this? It being cool won't do anyone any good.
--
Colin
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Lawrence Kesteloot <lk at teamten.com> wrote:
> Okay so this is 2011. Can we use the Unicode lambda symbol? Of course
> also support some digraph, like ,\
>
> IDEs would adapt instantly, as would window-based editors like gvim.
> Terminal text editors might have problems. Then there are possible
> problems with source file encoding ambiguity (when not specified
> explicitly).
>
> So yeah there would be a bunch of problems, but if we could solve
> them, how *cool* would that be?
>
> Lawrence
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:27 PM, maurizio cimadamore
> <maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com> wrote:
> > On 21/06/2011 17:47, Pavel Minaev wrote:
> >> Isn't this only true for statement lambdas? What about Strawman
> >> expression syntax, which doesn't have ')' '{'?
> > I was assuming a simplified version of Strawman (that has been discussed
> > in this mailing list) in which both statements and expressions have the
> > '{' '}'.
> >
> > Maurizio
> >>
> >> Either way, it seems that it would require infinite lookahead to parse?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Maurizio Cimadamore
> >> <maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com
> >> <mailto:maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 21/06/11 17:14, Sam Pullara wrote:
> >> > Both the $ and _ are valid method names so this would likely not
> >> work.
> >> This wouldn't be much of a problem, as the Strawman syntax cannot
> >> possibly be confused with a method call - the compiler would need to
> >> look for the 'special' token sequence ')' '{' after the '_' or '$'.
> >>
> >> Maurizio
> >> > Sam
> >> >
> >> > On Jun 21, 2011, at 2:57 AM, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 21/06/11 10:42, Milos Nikic wrote:
> >> >>> Well since you are mentioning, i think it is not unreasonable
> >> to say that
> >> >>> $ could be on this list too.
> >> >>> $ is not very different than #, in that java web developers
> >> use # for jsf
> >> >>> based expressions, and $ for jsp ones.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> $(x) { return x + 1; }
> >> >>> ${x -> x + 1}
> >> >> What about '_' as in:
> >> >>
> >> >> _(x) { return x + 1; }
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> It's less intrusive than # and it has that 'unnamed' feeling that
> I
> >> >> think fits well in this case...
> >> >>
> >> >> Maurizio
> >> >>> Regards,
> >> >>> Milos
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Stephen Colebourne
> >> >>> <scolebourne at joda.org <mailto:scolebourne at joda.org>>wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> Prefix character summary after 15 hours:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Use a #
> >> >>>> #(x) { return x + 1; }
> >> >>>> #{x -> x + 1}
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Use a ^
> >> >>>> ^(x) { return x + 1; }
> >> >>>> ^{x -> x + 1}
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Use a \ (from another thread)
> >> >>>> \(x) { return x + 1; }
> >> >>>> \{x -> x + 1}
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> (I'm not listing keywords that have been suggested elsewhere)
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Issues around typing the various characters on different
> >> keyboards
> >> >>>> have been raised.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Once again, does anyone have a character they prefer more
> >> than one of
> >> >>>> the three above that they want to be considered? Remember,
> >> this isn't
> >> >>>> a vote, or a discussion thread, but a "gathering the options"
> >> thread.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Stephen
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On 20 June 2011 18:54, Stephen
> >> Colebourne<scolebourne at joda.org <mailto:scolebourne at joda.org>>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>>> The four syntax families split into two types, those with a
> >> prefix
> >> >>>>> symbol and those without.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> The prefix symbol is commonly mentioned as #:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> #(x) { return x + 1; }
> >> >>>>> #{x -> x + 1}
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> *** If you have a strong desire to see any symbol other than #
> >> >>>>> considered then please respond to this thread. ***
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> - Your reply MUST specify the symbol
> >> >>>>> - Your reply MUST give a brief justification
> >> >>>>> - Your reply MUST repeat the two examples above using your
> >> preferred
> >> >>>> symbol
> >> >>>>> - You SHOULD try to ensure that your alternate symbol choice
> >> would
> >> >>>>> parse acceptably
> >> >>>>> - You MAY reply to suggest a keyword, however you should
> >> expect that
> >> >>>>> to be rejected
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Thread rules:
> >> >>>>> - Only reply if you prefer your alternate symbol to #
> >> >>>>> - To discuss something, change the thread title
> >> >>>>> - Don't reply just to say "I don't want a prefix symbol"
> >> >>>>> - Responding with a symbol suggestion doesn't preclude your
> >> first
> >> >>>>> choice actually being "no prefix symbol"
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> For example, my preferred choice of prefix symbol is #, thus
> >> I should
> >> >>>>> not respond to this thread!
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Stephen
> >> >>>>> (this is an experiment to see if we can focus on one
> particular
> >> >>>>> discussion element at a time)
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
More information about the lambda-dev
mailing list