Extension vs defender methods

[Neal Gafter]

On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com>wrote:

> One of the other names that has been proposed is "default methods", which
> I think is a fairly good name.
>

How about "non-abstract" or "concrete" method?  Once it is in the language,
there is little reason for these methods to have a different name than the
corresponding construct in a class.