Default methods syntax survey
Ali Ebrahimi
ali.ebrahimi1781 at gmail.com
Tue Aug 7 14:36:07 PDT 2012
+1
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Lukas Eder <lukas.eder at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Here is a one-question syntax survey on default methods for Java SE 8:
> > https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/9VPJZQQ
> >
> > Feel free to republish elsewhere; survey will close on Friday of this
> week.
>
> Since opinions on the position of "default" are welcome, I hope it's
> not spam if I ask again, why option 3 is not an option:
>
> 1. void foo() default {
> System.out.println("foo");
> }
>
> 2. default void foo() {
> System.out.println("foo");
> }
>
> 3. void foo() {
> System.out.println("foo");
> }
>
> The survey question states the following:
>
> > in the same way we can have static methods, abstract methods, etc, and
> the keyword takes the same place as abstract or static would. Which feels
> more natural?
>
> I feel that the "default" keyword doesn't feel very natural at all.
> The fact that the method has a body is expressive enough to indicate
> that it is a "default" method. Classes don't have default methods
> either, although class methods behave in similar ways as default
> methods... I know that "final" is out of scope for Java 8, just like
> "static". Yet, thinking about "final default" or "default final" or
> "static default" really doesn't feel natural.
>
> After this, I promise, I won't try my luck again on having default removed
> :-)
>
>
More information about the lambda-dev
mailing list