Request for Review: CR#8001667, second attempt

[Peter Levart]

On 12/07/2012 06:27 PM, Henry Jen wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2012, at 1:09 AM, Peter Levart <peter.levart at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Henry,
>>
>> I don't know what the plans are about moving the static methods in Comparators to the Comparator interface when static interface methods are enabled, but if that is planned, there will be a clash between Comparator.reverseOrder() default method and static method with same name and signature.
>>
> We will be exploring that along with other classes given static default method support ready.
>
> Cheers,
> Henry
>

And what about the aComparator.thenComparing(Comparator) method name? Do 
you think it's ok to use the same name as in 
aComparator.thenComparing(Function)  ?

A suitable alternative might be aComparator.thenUsing(Comparator).

Regards, Peter