Feedback on the implementation of StringJoiner

Roel Spilker r.spilker at gmail.com
Mon Dec 10 01:59:57 PST 2012


I understand. If I can help in any way, please let me know. I did sign an
OCA 10 days ago, however, I don't know if it has been processed.


On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Jim Gish <jim.gish at oracle.com> wrote:

> Hi Roel,
>
> I'll take a look.  Sorry for the delay -- got pulled into other things.
>
> Jim
>
> On 11/28/2012 02:41 PM, Roel Spilker wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On June 25 I sent some feedback on the implementation of StringJoiner.
>> Most
>> of it is still relevant, none of it is addressed. Is there anything I can
>> do to get the implementation to a higher level?
>>
>> Roel
>>
>> Thread containing the feedback
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/**pipermail/lambda-dev/2012-**
>> June/005078.html<http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-dev/2012-June/005078.html>
>>
>> Link to the current implementation
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/**lambda/lambda/jdk/file/**
>> 83923cc50252/src/share/**classes/java/util/**StringJoiner.java<http://hg.openjdk.java.net/lambda/lambda/jdk/file/83923cc50252/src/share/classes/java/util/StringJoiner.java>
>>
>>
> --
> Jim Gish | Consulting Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.0304
> Oracle Java Platform Group | Core Libraries Team
> 35 Network Drive
> Burlington, MA 01803
> jim.gish at oracle.com
>
>


More information about the lambda-dev mailing list