Collection stream() and parallel()

[Brian Goetz]

This is under discussion in the EG now.

On 12/10/2012 4:09 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> I was surprised to see both these methods return Streams with such
> wildly different method names. After seeing stream(), I was not
> expecting another method to return streams -- it seemed like the
> former was the "de facto" way of getting one.
>
> Would you consider perhaps renaming them? Something akin to
> serialStream() and parallelStream()? Or streamSerially() and
> streamParallely()?
>
> Paul
>