RFR: 8001647: In-place methods on Collection/List
Akhil Arora
akhil.arora at oracle.com
Mon Dec 10 13:48:25 PST 2012
Updated with yours and Alan's comments -
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~akhil/8001647.2/webrev/
- removed null check for removeSet
- cache this.size in removeAll, replaceAll
(for ArrayList, Vector and CopyOnWriteArrayList)
- calculate removeCount instead of BitCount.cardinality()
- removed unnecessary @library from test support classes
Catching IndexOOB and throwing CME in forEach/removeAll/replaceAll seems
unecessary... did you have a use-case in mind where an IndexOOB can
occur with these methods?
Thanks
On 12/08/2012 05:11 AM, Arne Siegel wrote:
> ArrayList.java, line 1171:
> final boolean anyToRemove = (removeSet != null) && !removeSet.isEmpty();
> As removeSet will never be null, this line can be simplified. This is a left-over from the
> preceding implementation (see b67).
>
> ArrayList.java, method forEach optimizes the loop by reducing the number of heap accesses:
> final int size = this.size;
> for (int i=0; modCount == expectedModCount && i < size; i++) {
> ...
> This trick might also be introduced to methods removeAll and replaceAll.
>
> In the ListIterator implementation of ArrayList, there are various appearances of the idiom:
> try {
> ...
> } catch (IndexOutOfBoundsException ex) {
> throw new ConcurrentModificationException();
> }
> This technique might also be used in forEach, removeAll, and replaceAll (though not likely to
> be of any importance).
>
> Regards
> Arne Siegel
>
More information about the lambda-dev
mailing list