infinite.parallel().sequential().iterator() -> OOM

[Brian Goetz]

Yeah, same issue -- sequential() on a parallel stream is a full barrier.

The right answer to this may well be to get rid of sequential(), which 
is being discussed in the EG.  We've found some ways to eliminate its 
primary motivation.

On 12/24/2012 12:00 PM, Dmitry Bessonov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here's an issue similar to the one reported recently. For example:
>
>    Streams.repeat("a").parallel().sequential().iterator();
>
> on b69 leads to something like
>
> Exception in thread "ForkJoinPool.commonPool-worker-7" Exception in
> thread "ForkJoinPool.commonPool-worker-3" Exception in thread
> "ForkJoinPool.commonPool-worker-1" Exception in thread
> "ForkJoinPool.commonPool-worker-3" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap
> space
> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
>
>
> -Dmitry
>