The question about lambda's performance
Brian Goetz
brian.goetz at oracle.com
Mon Feb 20 20:31:40 PST 2012
We post docs here as they become available. Watch this space!
On 2/20/2012 9:57 PM, Îâè±Ô¨ wrote:
> Thx for your reply , are there some blogs or doces about the plan and so
> on ?
>
> 2012/2/21 Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com
> <mailto:brian.goetz at oracle.com>>
>
> Thanks for trying out the implementation!
>
> We are still very much in the prototype stage of the development of
> the implementation. Currently the compiler generates inner classes,
> but that is definitely a temporary strategy. Our focus has been
> exclusively on delivering something that works, so people can try it
> out. Many shortcuts have been taken to get something in people's
> hands as early as possible, so that we could get feedback on the
> usability of the features.
>
> Any conclusions drawn from performance measurements at this time
> would definitely be premature.
>
>
>
> On 2/20/2012 8:33 PM, Îâè±Ô¨ wrote:
>
> Hi, I'm from china and take care of lamdba project these days.
>
> I'm sorry for last mail is not whole... so I send again.
>
> I read the doc of
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~__briangoetz/lambda/lambda-__state-4.html
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~briangoetz/lambda/lambda-state-4.html>
> very
> carefully, the lambda spec is so simple, but there is a question
> about
> performance.
>
> In section 1 background , we get the information that the "callback
> interface" nearly can not increase the performance by multicore
> cpu or
> parallel-programming. But there is no info in the follow part
> about the
> target of lambda. Is there some improvement of JVM about this?
>
> I test the "javap -c" to the classes , there are no "invokedynamic"
> created, and test the cost time of inner classes and lambda ,it
> seems
> lambda codes cost a little more time.
>
> Thx resd my question! If there are any unclear because my pool
> English
> please note me!
> B&R
>
>
More information about the lambda-dev
mailing list