C/P/N/Q par vs. seq break-even analysis with 10ms think time

[Aleksey Shipilev]

On 10/18/2012 04:30 PM, Edward Harned wrote:
> The F/J software I maintain considers flexibility, simplicity, error
> recovery, and accountability before raw speed. So, I don’t have a
> parallel engine alternative to FJP.

Great! So there is nothing to talk about.

> I do understand that FJP is all you have. That is the problem. Why
> haven’t all those pragmatic engineers put C# to shame? Relying on an
> academic-centric niche product doesn’t seem so pragmatic.

Relying on the only viable option at the moment is pragmatic. As I said
before, if anyone knows anything better, please show it to us. I'm
open-minded about this, but having developed lots of hardcore concurrent
code, I seriously doubt the existence of something better.

-Aleksey.