Review + pull request: update FJP

[Aleksey Shipilev]

Please see the updated version at:
 http://shipilev.net/pub/jdk/lambda/20121029-fjp-update-3.patch.gz

-Aleksey.

On 10/30/2012 07:38 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> It turns out, there's the final version of the new update to FJP coming
> to jsr166. Please hold on while I'm updating the patch.
> 
> -Alesey.
> 
> On 10/30/2012 03:44 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> Sure, but I think lambda/lambda is already ahead, and for a reason:
>> performance investigations for lambdas require latest and greatest code.
>> In this particular case, this involves more changes in lambda code itself.
>>
>> The jsr166 -> jdk8 -> lambda turnaround is longer than bearable for
>> active development.
>>
>> -Aleksey.
>>
>> On 10/30/2012 03:41 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>>> Aleksey,
>>>
>>> There are plans to sync up jdk8 with latest jsr166 changes. Once that
>>> happens they can appear in the lambda repos too.
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> On 30/10/2012 8:50 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Please consider pulling up the update for new ForkJoinPool from jsr166.
>>>> Doug had implemented a few features which are to provide much better
>>>> wakeup performance. (Brian, this is the same patch I've cc'ed you
>>>> before).
>>>>
>>>> Here's the patch against JDK:
>>>>   http://shipilev.net/pub/jdk/lambda/20121029-fjp-update-2.patch.gz
>>>>
>>>> Testing:
>>>>   - custom builds on Linux x86_64;
>>>>   - decomposition performance benchmarks;
>>>>   - fjp-trace logs
>>>>
>>>> I could generate the webrev, if that is more appropriate.
>>>>
>>>> -Aleksey
>>>>
>>
>>
>