Optional class is just a Value
Ben Evans
benjamin.john.evans at gmail.com
Wed Sep 19 11:38:50 PDT 2012
At the risk of asking a possibly-stupid question, how does this
interact with JSR 308?
Surely a value which is missing is represented by a null, so wouldn't
an alternative to Optional be a @Nullable 308 annotation?
Thanks,
Ben
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Vitaly Davidovich <vitalyd at gmail.com> wrote:
> Agree, I like Optional as well. Also, the name implies that there's
> something special about it; Value is too generic and doesn't have the same
> effect.
>
> Sent from my phone
> On Sep 19, 2012 1:47 PM, "Kevin Bourrillion" <kevinb at google.com> wrote:
>
>> For what it's worth, the Guava team still feels very happy with our choice
>> of the name Optional for this construct. An Optional<String> *is* an
>> optional string. It is not an "option string". And it rolls of the tongue
>> a lot better than a "maybe string". It's certainly not well described as a
>> "value string".
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Julian Hyde <julianhyde at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Sep 19, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Paul Benedict <pbenedict at apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I think the Optional class could be better named. I consider it a
>> > negative
>> > > noun -- focusing on its ability to not contain a value.
>> >
>> > The name made sense to me... but then I was familiar with the similar
>> > concept in Scala.
>> >
>> > http://www.scala-lang.org/api/current/scala/Option.html
>> >
>> > On reflection, the Scala name makes more sense. "Optional" (adjective)
>> > implies behavioral (hence usually applies to an interface) whereas
>> "Option"
>> > (noun) implies structural.
>> >
>> > Julian
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kevin Bourrillion | Java Librarian | kevinb at google.com | 650-450-7126
>>
>>
>
More information about the lambda-dev
mailing list