Optional != @Nullable
Artur Biesiadowski
abies at adres.pl
Sun Sep 30 01:36:21 PDT 2012
On 30/09/2012 10:13, Jed Wesley-Smith wrote:
>
> Option<String> address(Session session) {
> return optional(
> session.getIoSession().getRemoteAddress()
> ).flatMap(socketAddress -> optional(socketAddress.getAddress())
> ).flatMap(inetAddress -> optional(inetAddress.getHostAddress()));
> }
Is it really more readable than
return session.getIoSession().getRemoteAddress().?getAddress().?getHostAddress();
?
Given java history and existing libraries, I think that repurposing null
as None, assuming non-null contents of collections for most of
lambda-empowered libraries/utilities and providing few operators for
safe traversal (?. and ?: at least) would be a lot more useful solution.
Regards,
Artur Biesiadowski
More information about the lambda-dev
mailing list