Trouble with wildcards
Remi Forax
forax at univ-mlv.fr
Mon Dec 16 13:38:22 PST 2013
On 12/16/2013 03:42 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> Hi Remi,
>
> Reducing it down a little:
>
> import java.util.*;
> import java.util.function.*;
>
> class A {
>
> static class X {};
> static class Y extends X {};
>
> public static void main(String[] args) {
> Predicate<X> px = x -> x instanceof X;
> Predicate<Y> py = y -> y instanceof Y;
>
> Predicate<? super Y> psy = px;
>
> Predicate<? super Y> superyandy = psy.and(py); // <-- error
> superyandy.test(new Y());
> }
> }
>
> $ javac -Xdiags:verbose A.java
> A.java:15: error: method and in interface Predicate<T> cannot be applied to given types;
> Predicate<? super Y> superyandy = psy.and(py); // <-- error
> ^
> required: Predicate<? super CAP#1>
> found: Predicate<Y>
> reason: argument mismatch; Predicate<Y> cannot be converted to Predicate<? super CAP#1>
> where T is a type-variable:
> T extends Object declared in interface Predicate
> where CAP#1 is a fresh type-variable:
> CAP#1 extends Object super: Y from capture of ? super Y
> 1 error
>
>
> It's confusing...
>
> Paul.
indeed :)
Rémi
>
> On Dec 14, 2013, at 7:43 PM, Remi Forax <forax at univ-mlv.fr> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> I've tried to explain in code how a Stream (here a Flow to avoid
>> confusion) can be implemented (just filter/map, only a sequential
>> stream) with consecutive operations, filter.filter or map.map optimized.
>>
>> I end up with the code below which compiles but if instead of
>> return Flow.this.filter(/*predicate.and(predicate2)*/ t ->
>> predicate.test(t) && predicate2.test(t));
>> I replace it by
>> return Flow.this.filter(predicate.and(predicate2));
>> the compiler refuses to compile and I don't understand why :(
>>
>> Here predicate is a Predicate<? super T>, so predicate2 should be a
>> Predicate<? super ? super T>,
>> because and() is declared like this: Predicate<T>.and(Predicate<? super T>)
>> predicate2 is a Predicate<? super T> so it should match Predicate<?
>> super ? super T> but
>> it doesn't.
>>
>> Is it a bug in the compiler or in my head ?
>>
>> cheers,
>> Rémi
>>
>> @FunctionalInterface
>> public interface Flow<T> {
>> public void forEach(Consumer<? super T> consumer);
>>
>> public default Flow<T> filter(Predicate<? super T> predicate) {
>> return new Flow<T>() {
>> @Override
>> public void forEach(Consumer<? super T> consumer) {
>> Flow.this.forEach(u -> {
>> if (predicate.test(u)) {
>> consumer.accept(u);
>> }
>> });
>> }
>> @Override
>> public Flow<T> filter(Predicate<? super T> predicate2) {
>> return Flow.this.filter(/*predicate.and(predicate2)*/ t ->
>> predicate.test(t) && predicate2.test(t));
>> }
>> };
>> }
>>
>> public default <R> Flow<R> map(Function<? super T, ? extends R>
>> function) {
>> return new Flow<R>() {
>> @Override
>> public void forEach(Consumer<? super R> consumer) {
>> Flow.this.forEach(t -> consumer.accept(function.apply(t)));
>> }
>> @Override
>> public <U> Flow<U> map(Function<? super R, ? extends U> function2) {
>> return Flow.this.map(function.andThen(function2));
>> }
>> };
>> }
>>
>> public static <T> Flow<T> create(Iterable<? extends T> iterable) {
>> return iterable::forEach;
>> }
>>
>> public static void main(String[] args) {
>> List<Integer> list = IntStream.range(0,
>> 10).boxed().collect(Collectors.toList());
>> Flow<Integer> flow = create(list);
>> flow.filter(x -> x != 5).filter(x -> x !=
>> 2).forEach(System.out::println);
>> flow.map(x -> x * 2).map(x -> x + 1).forEach(System.out::println);
>> flow.filter(x -> x != 5).map(x -> x * 2).filter(x -> x != 2).map(x
>> -> x / 2).forEach(System.out::println);
>> }
>> }
>>
>
>
More information about the lambda-dev
mailing list