Java 8 syntax change between b63 and b65

[Frank Ding]

Hi bitter_fox,
   Thank you.  That's what I want.

Best regards,
Frank
On 1/31/2013 10:30 AM, bitter_fox wrote:
> Hi, Frank.
>
> Producing compile-time error is a correct behavior.
>
> You can refer this thread on type-annotation-dev:
> [non-308] Scoping problem with Resolve and javac 6 vs. 7 vs. Eclipse
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/type-annotations-dev/2013-January/000417.html
>
> Regards,
> bitter_fox
>
>
> 2013/1/31 Frank Ding <dingxmin at linux.vnet.ibm.com 
> <mailto:dingxmin at linux.vnet.ibm.com>>
>
>     Hi David,
>        Thanks for your info.
>
>     To lambda-dev guys
>        Could you please help to take a look at the compilation issue
>     below?
>
>     Best regards,
>     Frank
>     On 1/30/2013 5:58 PM, David Holmes wrote:
>     > Hi Frank,
>     >
>     > Probably best to confirm this on lambda-dev but I suspect that
>     default
>     > method support introduced a bug in b63 that was fixed by b65.
>     >
>     > David
>     >
>     > On 30/01/2013 12:06 PM, Frank Ding wrote:
>     >> Hi guys,
>     >> I noticed there is a change in Java 8 between b63 and b65. The
>     change
>     >> can be illustrated by compiling following Issue class.
>     >>
>     >> public class Issue {
>     >> interface Handler {
>     >> public void handle();
>     >> }
>     >>
>     >> interface Listener {
>     >> public void listen();
>     >> }
>     >>
>     >> Handler handlerImpl = new Handler() {
>     >> public void listen(Object... obj) {
>     >> // do nothing
>     >> }
>     >>
>     >> @Override
>     >> public void handle() {
>     >> new Listener() {
>     >>
>     >> @Override
>     >> public void listen() {
>     >> listen(null);
>     >> }
>     >> };
>     >> }
>     >> };
>     >> }
>     >>
>     >> With OpenJDK 8 b65, compilation goes well whereas b63 failed,
>     >> complaining that
>     >>
>     >> Issue.java:22: error: method listen in class <anonymous
>     Listener> cannot
>     >> be applied to given types;
>     >> listen(null);
>     >> ^
>     >> required: no arguments
>     >> found: <null>
>     >> reason: actual and formal argument lists differ in length
>     >> 1 error
>     >>
>     >> Could anybody kindly take a look at it and point out what
>     Oracle bug or
>     >> feature has been built into b65 which is not available in b63?
>     It would
>     >> be very helpful.
>     >>
>     >> Best regards,
>     >> Frank
>     >>
>     >
>
>
>