RFR: 8017231: Add StringJoiner.merge
Henry Jen
henry.jen at oracle.com
Wed Jul 3 10:14:02 PDT 2013
On Jul 3, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Henry Jen <henry.jen at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 3, 2013, at 9:09 AM, Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> On 03/07/2013 09:03, Henry Jen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Please review a simple addition of StringJoiner.merge method. This is
>>> useful to combine StringJoiners used in parallel doing joining works.
>>>
>>> The webrev can be found at
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~henryjen/ccc/8017231.0/webrev/
>>>
>>> Also included is a little clean up for StringJoinerTest.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Henry
>> Is this named "merge" to disambiguate it from "add"? Just wondering.
>>
>
> I think it's a better reflection on the fact of "merge" of elements like collections, instead of feels like add(StringJoiner.toString()).
>
>> A minor point but I think the wider javadoc tends to use "the given XYZ" when referring to parameters rather than the "the supplied XYZ".
>>
>> Typo "nonempty" -> "non-empty".
>>
>
> Will fix those.
>
>> I assume you meant to name the local otherBuilder rather than an otherBuffer. Also is there any reason not to use append(CharSequence,int,int) here?
>>
>
> Will fix the naming as well.
>
> As for append, I don't think there is a particular reason.
>
I should said the range check is the reason.
Cheers,
Henry
> It would be best if we can do append(char[], start, end), but I don't see there is any way to do that. I suspect append(CS, int, int) should be a little faster without increasing the count each time give a check of range.
>
> I'll update it to use append(CharSequence, int, int).
>
More information about the lambda-dev
mailing list