RFR 8009736: Comparator API cleanup
Remi Forax
forax at univ-mlv.fr
Fri Jun 14 16:12:20 PDT 2013
On 06/14/2013 11:44 PM, John Rose wrote:
> On Jun 14, 2013, at 3:07 AM, Paul Sandoz <paul.sandoz at oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> this.real = (Comparator<T>) Objects.requireNonNull(real);
> Regarding this idiom, I added the following comment to JDK-6919064:
>
>> New JDK 8 code is making frequent use of static methods like Objects.requireNonNull and Objects.equal. If these were open-coded (that is, inlined by hand), the branches and virtual calls (to Object.equals) would be profiled per caller. As global functions, their profiles are polluted, which may cause performance problems.
>> A fix to this bug should demonstrate that Objects.requireNonNull and Objects.equal are as fast as their open-coded equivalents, even in the presence of profile pollution. To pollute the profile of these methods, simply pre-warm the benchmark by a small loop passing a variety of nulls and non-null references to various classes to the arguments of these methods.
> http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6919064
>
> — John
>
Objects.requireNonNull is as fast as a hand written check if there is no
code that catch the NullPointerException thrown by requireNonNull in the
whole application. I think it's more efficient for the whole Java
community to start a witch hunt to find developers that write codes that
catch NPEs
thrown by a Objects.requireNonNull than to write benchmarks for every
methods that starts with a Objects.requireNonNull.
The other solution is to fix http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8015416
Rémi
More information about the lambda-dev
mailing list