Substitute for Functions.string() ?

[Michael Nascimento]

What is the rationale to remove it given developers will probably make
the same bad choice I was doing?

Regards,
Michael

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Mike Duigou <mike.duigou at oracle.com> wrote:
> String::valueOf is the best choice. It is what Functions.string() used to use.
>
> Mike
>
> On Mar 20 2013, at 10:52 , Michael Nascimento wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> My code was using Functions.string() before b81. What is the
>> alternative now? Object::toString() ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Michael
>>
>