Collectors.to* signatures
Brian Goetz
brian.goetz at oracle.com
Fri May 10 17:41:57 PDT 2013
We are generally exceedingly down on the idea of something returning
Foo<? extends ...>, for obvious reasons -- its annoying and useless.
Here, the uselessness is the intended goal, but that doesn't do anything
about the annoying part.
On 5/10/2013 8:02 PM, Michael Nascimento wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I wonder what you think about this one.
>
> Regards,
> Michael
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Michael Nascimento <misterm at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Just got bitten by the fact toList() *might* produce an immutable list.
>>
>> Since we don't have immutable collections as types in Java, I wonder
>> if the old ugly List<? extends T> wouldn't be a better return type,
>> effectively preventing people from doing what I did.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Michael
>
More information about the lambda-dev
mailing list