Updated SotL/L documents for Iteration 2

[David Holmes]

Hi Brian,

On 11/09/2012 3:57 AM, Brian Goetz wrote:
> Re-sending copies of documents sent last week.

I'm very much a lay-person in terms of being a consumer of these API's, 
and from that perspective I think we are telling a good story here. So 
well done to all for getting things to this stage.

I have two queries on the parallel aspects of this:

1. There's no mention (as yet) of any hooks into the underlying parallel 
implementations i.e controlling what FJPool to use. Is the thinking that 
we will go with the "default" FJPool concept as currently outlined in 
ForkJoinUtils?

2. It seems to me that if arrays can be converted to stream() and 
parallel() then we no longer need the old-style 
ForkJoinUtils.parallelSort API? (Though I'm unsure where all the 
implementation code would live if we don't have it.)

David