Streams
Doug Lea
dl at cs.oswego.edu
Fri Sep 14 05:36:35 PDT 2012
On 09/14/12 08:30, Remi Forax wrote:
> There is in my opinion a better design,
> x = s.findFirst(valueIfEmpty);
>
> the default value is a parameter of the current function
Yes, sorry not to have listed this option. I like it too.
Some people hate it so much that I don't think it will be
adopted though :-) At least when applied in cases like:
x. = max(Long.MIN_VALUE);
-Doug
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-experts
mailing list