Nulls
Doug Lea
dl at cs.oswego.edu
Mon Sep 24 16:21:43 PDT 2012
On 09/24/12 12:08, Brian Goetz wrote:
> I think we're trying to not encourage further abuse. There's consensus that
> present Optional should NOT store null. Similarly, the Joe/Tim/Brian cabal is
> trying to NOT burden the streams API/implementation with any special
> null-awareness, again for the sake of not coddling abuse.
>
I'm still a little bit in disbelief about the proposal.
The spec for findAny would look like:
* @return ... an absent Optional if no element matches
* the given predicate, or if the predicate reports true for
* a null argument and the stream contains a null element,
* possibly even if the predicate also holds for another
* nonnull element
OK?
-Doug
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-experts
mailing list