Varargs stream factory methods
Sam Pullara
spullara at gmail.com
Sat Apr 20 10:02:12 PDT 2013
I like the .of() idea better than overloading .stream().
Sam
On Apr 20, 2013, at 8:47 AM, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com> wrote:
> Currently we have, in Arrays:
>
> public static <T> Stream<T> stream(T[] array) {
> return stream(array, 0, array.length);
> }
>
> public static IntStream stream(int[] array) {
> return stream(array, 0, array.length);
> }
>
> etc.
>
> We *could* make these varargs methods, which is useful as creating ad-hoc stream literals:
>
> Arrays.stream(1, 2, 4, 8).map(...)
>
> The downside is that we would have to lose (or rename) methods like:
>
> public static IntStream stream(int[] array,
> int fromIndex, int toIndex) {
>
> since stream(1, 2, 3) would be ambiguous.
>
> Probably better, make these static factories in the various stream interfaces:
>
> Stream.of("foo", "bar")
>
> IntStream.of(1, 2, 4, 8)
>
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-experts
mailing list