FlatMapper

[Sam Pullara]

I like mapInto as well.

Sam

On Feb 21, 2013, at 8:46 AM, Tim Peierls <tim at peierls.net> wrote:

> Yes, mapInto is better than flattenInto.
> 
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com> wrote:
> Is mapInto better than flattenInto?  Still trivial to change at this point.
> 
> 
> On 2/21/2013 11:33 AM, Kevin Bourrillion wrote:
> Tardy, but:  the Googlers I ran this by all felt just fine with
> "mapInto".  Sure, you can map /multiple, /but that fact just didn't seem
> 
> overly necessary to force into the name.
> 
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Joe Bowbeer <joe.bowbeer at gmail.com
> <mailto:joe.bowbeer at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     flattenInto gets my vote
> 
>     On Feb 17, 2013 11:09 AM, "Remi Forax" <forax at univ-mlv.fr
>     <mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr>> wrote:
> 
>         On 02/17/2013 08:07 PM, Brian Goetz wrote:
> 
>             flattenInto seems the best so far.
> 
> 
>         +1
> 
>         Rémi
> 
> 
>             On 2/17/2013 9:36 AM, Tim Peierls wrote:
> 
>                 On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Remi Forax
>                 <forax at univ-mlv.fr <mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr>
>                 <mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr <mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr>>>
> 
>                 wrote:
> 
>                      mapAndFlattenInto is a little to verbose for me,
>                 mapAndFlat ?
> 
> 
>                 No, has to be a verb.
> 
>                 I'd still understand flattenInto, leaving the mapping
>                 part to be implied
>                 by the type name.
> 
>                 --tim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Kevin Bourrillion | Java Librarian | Google, Inc. |kevinb at google.com
> <mailto:kevinb at google.com>
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-libs-spec-experts/attachments/20130221/21567f1f/attachment.html