Map.asFunction

[Remi Forax]

On 01/04/2013 07:21 PM, Doug Lea wrote:
> On 01/04/13 12:17, Remi Forax wrote:
>
>>>>    default Function<K,V> asFunction() { return { k -> get(k) }; }
>>>>
>>>> Did we decide not to do this or just forget to do it?
>>>>
>> Not sure it worth a method as it can be written map::get or 
>> set::contains.
>>
>
> Good point. Assuming that matching and overload resolution become
> a little more deterministic soon :-), 

always failing is deterministic :)

That's said, I've not found the time to read the latest draft sent by Dan.

> there's no reason to encourage
> people to use an explicit method for these purposes.
>
> -Doug
>

Rémi