Name of lambda parameters

[Brian Goetz]

Also, this doesn't really "complete" anything.  All it does is kick the 
"why can't we" questions down the road -- "why can't we annotate 
lambdas, we can annotate methods?"  (And, if we try to "complete" that, 
it will be "why are lambda expressions special, and not all 
expressions?")  This creates more incompleteness than it addresses.

On 1/8/2013 11:43 AM, Tim Peierls wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Remi Forax <forax at univ-mlv.fr
> <mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr>> wrote:
>
>     We should have a way to get lambda parameter names and parameter
>     annotations at least just for completeness.
>
>
> I disagree. "Just for completeness" is not compelling.
>
> --tim