One more pass on flatMap/mapMulti
Remi Forax
forax at univ-mlv.fr
Thu Jan 10 09:43:04 PST 2013
On 01/10/2013 06:28 PM, Tim Peierls wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com
> <mailto:brian.goetz at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> Bikeshed discussions can continue.
>
>
> OK, then! :-)
>
> The method name "send" is OK, but you wouldn't be seeing it in the
> signature of explode. What you would see is Downstream<T>, which still
> bugs me. The word "downstream" is an adverb or adjective, not a noun.
> Things are sent downstream, they aren't sent *to* a downstream.
>
> Was Acceptor.accept proposed and rejected already? If so, why? I would
> understand
>
> explode(BiBlock<Acceptor<T>, T>))
wildcard intervention:
explode(BiBlock<Acceptor<? super T>, ? super T>))
>
> --tim
Rémi
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-experts
mailing list