Function type naming conventions

[Tim Peierls]

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Joe Bowbeer <joe.bowbeer at gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 ObjIntBlock (or a more descriptive "Block" name if one is selected)
>

Agreed.

Works well in conjunction with Dan Smith's suggestion ('if the base type is
parameterized in both its parameters and return, then the "To" prefix is
mandatory.  If not, "To" is not used.'), omitting To and Bi where they
aren't needed.

--tim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-libs-spec-experts/attachments/20130124/cca9c4aa/attachment.html