MumbleCloseable

[Brian Goetz]

OK, which do we like best:

     MayHoldCloseableResource
     MayHoldResource
     MayHoldCloseable

?

On 6/26/2013 6:45 PM, Doug Lea wrote:
> On 06/26/13 16:36, Brian Goetz wrote:
>> What do we think of this name?
>>
>>    MayHoldCloseableResource
>>
>
> The royal We thinks: fine :-)
> If we can't have a stunningly great name, we can at least have
> a stunningly clear one.
>
> -Doug
>
>
>> Shortenings might include:
>>
>>    MayHoldResource
>>    MayHoldCloseable
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/25/2013 11:37 AM, Brian Goetz wrote:
>>> Actually,
>>>
>>> MayHoldCloseableResource
>>>
>>> seems not too bad.  It is a tad wordy, but relatively few people will
>>> have to type it, and reading it is pretty clear -- this object may hold
>>> a closeable resource.
>>>
>>> On 6/25/2013 11:14 AM, Brian Goetz wrote:
>>>>> These together provide something better than any other related
>>>>> schemes I know. I think that if we cam up with stunningly
>>>>> good names for these, the plan would be completely uncontroversial.
>>>>
>>>> MayHoldResource
>>>> HoldsResource
>>>> MayRequireClosing
>>>> ...
>>
>