Ranges redux

[Brian Goetz]

I am OK with cutting back on ranges further.  range/rangeClosed seem 
good enough to me for integral ranges (along with convenience ints/longs 
methods).

On 5/8/2013 3:05 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think we reached consensus on:
>
> - {Int, Long}String.range/rangeClosed for step of 1
>
> IMO that seems good enough, and we can provide examples using map for step > 1 and descending ranges.
>
> We have still to converge on DoubleStream.range, which might suggest no strong opinions or we lack the use-cases. There are some tricky edge-cases to deal with. I am very close to proposing we drop it...
>
> Paul.
>