Ranges redux

[Paul Sandoz]

On May 8, 2013, at 9:40 PM, Tim Peierls <tim at peierls.net> wrote:

> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Doug Lea <dl at cs.oswego.edu> wrote:
> 
>> On 05/08/13 15:24, Brian Goetz wrote:
>> 
>>> I am OK with cutting back on ranges further.  range/rangeClosed seem good
>>> enough
>>> 
>> 
>> rangeClosed -> closedRange?
> 
> 
> Maybe, but it's nice when they sort together in the javadoc method list.
> 

Yes, although like the readability, i think sorting and grouping for auto-completion are useful.

Paul.