Combiner -> BiFunction?

[Remi Forax]

On 12/10/2012 05:03 PM, Brian Goetz wrote:
> Are we OK with just merging Combiner into BiFunction?  Both are the 
> same signature: (T,U) -> V.
>
> Ordinarily I don't mind having specialized names if the name carries 
> extra meaning, but I'm not sure this one does.
>

Yes,
and I still think that UnrayOperator should be Operator and 
BinaryOperator should be BiOperator for consistency.

Rémi