Review Request: CR#8001634 : Initial set of lambda functional interfaces
Sam Pullara
spullara at gmail.com
Thu Nov 1 08:45:13 PDT 2012
The guava choices are generally very pragmatic and lean away from the
functional language names. Either way is fine with me as long as it
seems consistent.
Sam
All my photos are panoramas.
On Nov 1, 2012, at 8:38 AM, Brian Goetz <brian.goetz at oracle.com> wrote:
> Also I am starting to lean towards "Supplier<T>" instead of "Factory<T>", since factory connotes "make me a new one" and supplier merely connotes "find me one somehow." (This is consistent with Guava's choice.)
>
> On 11/1/2012 7:58 AM, Doug Lea wrote:
>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mduigou/8001634/2/webrev/
>>
>> My main non-technical reaction is that more I see "Mapper",
>> the more I hate it. It interacts awfully especially with Maps.
>> "Fun" (with lots of precedent in other languages) would
>> be fine. Even "Function" would be fine.
>>
>> -Doug
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers
mailing list